home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Amiga Plus 1995 #5 & #6
/
Amiga Plus CD - 1995 - No. 5 and 6.iso
/
pd
/
grafik
/
lightwave
/
lightwave-june95
/
000092_owner-lightwave@webcom.com_Wed Jun 7 06:45:53 1995.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-07-04
|
2KB
Received: by webcom.com
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA200182753; Wed, 7 Jun 1995 06:45:53 -0700
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave@webcom.com>
Received: from deathstar.cris.com by webcom.com with ESMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA200052749; Wed, 7 Jun 1995 06:45:49 -0700
Received: from deathstar.cris.com by deathstar.cris.com [1-800-745-CRIS (voice)]
Message-Id: <199506071349.JAA13910@deathstar.cris.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 95 06:49:24 EDT
From: tankt@cris.com (Tank Taylor)
Reply-To: tankt@cris.com (Tank Taylor)
To: lightwave@webcom.com
X-Mailer: PMMail v1.1 UNREGISTERED SHAREWARE
Subject: NT v. 95
Sender: owner-lightwave@webcom.com
Precedence: bulk
I had speed problems with Lightwave under NT, so I tried Win95. I've
gotten a 30% speed increase, but still far short of other's benchmarks
on 100mhz systems. Is anyone out there using ASUS Dual Pentium
motherboards? Someone suggested to me that the OS might need a
xxx.hal routine to suit my chipset/cpu combination or something
technical to that effect. Anyway... any input appreciated. I'm
certain it's something I've not set correctly, and not the fault of
NT.
Tank Taylor
Vision Imaging
tankt@cris.com
FS: 3 Copies of Lightwave 4.0PR (Intel) $760
--
tankt@cris.com (Tank Taylor) sent this message.
To Post a Message : lightwave@webcom.com
Un/Subscription Requests To : lightwave-request@webcom.com
(DIGEST) or : lightwave-digest-request@webcom.com
Administrative Items To : owner-lightwave@webcom.com